Workflow simulation comparing bare prompt versus bug-triage harness
Workflow simulation comparing bare prompt versus bug-triage harness is a 26.1-second Claude Opus motion design reference by @zuvexxx, built around code. GOAL: Make a workflow called bug-triage. Copy this AI motion prompt, keep the creator's frame counts and palette, and adapt the subject for your own launch film.
@zuvexxxView post
Prompt
GOAL:
Make a workflow called bug-triage.
MOTION:
Phase 1, in parallel: one agent per open issue labeled bug. Read the issue, trace it to a root cause in this repo, cite the files and lines. Effort medium.
Phase 2, in parallel: for each root cause, an Opus agent tries to refute it by writing a failing test next to the cited file, in an isolated worktree. If it can't reproduce the bug, mark it not confirmed. Effort high.
End with a report of confirmed bugs only: issue, root cause, path to the failing test.
Save it so I can rerun it as /bug-triage.
Author original
Make a workflow called bug-triage.
Phase 1, in parallel: one agent per open issue labeled bug. Read the issue, trace it to a root cause in this repo, cite the files and lines. Effort medium.
Phase 2, in parallel: for each root cause, an Opus agent tries to refute it by writing a failing test next to the cited file, in an isolated worktree. If it can't reproduce the bug, mark it not confirmed. Effort high.
End with a report of confirmed bugs only: issue, root cause, path to the failing test.
Save it so I can rerun it as /bug-triage.
Questions
What is this other prompt for?
It is a Claude Opus motion design brief for “Workflow simulation comparing bare prompt versus bug-triage harness”. Paste it into Claude and keep the timings already written in the prompt.
Where is the original film?
The creator is @zuvexxx. Use View post to open the X video this prompt belongs to.